Should you use the horn in the presented situation, in order to warn the cyclist of your intention to overtake?
Show the correct answer
Correct answer
NO
Explanation
In the video, you are driving a lorry along a street in town, and in front of you, at the right-hand edge of the roadway, there is a cyclist whom you intend to overtake; nothing indicates immediate danger. You are not allowed to use the horn to warn the cyclist that you are overtaking. The answer is: no.
The Road Traffic Act states that a driver may use a sound or light signal when it is necessary to warn of danger, and it prohibits using the horn in a built-up area unless it is necessary because of immediate danger. Normal overtaking is not such a danger - it is a routine manoeuvre which you perform keeping a lateral clearance of at least 1 m from the cyclist; the cyclist is indeed required to move as far to the right as possible to make overtaking easier, but you must not force them to do so with the horn. A lorry horn right behind their back may frighten them and make them wobble or swerve under your wheels - the opposite of what you intended. You use the horn only when, for example, the cyclist starts turning left without seeing you, or when a car is coming out of a gateway - then the signal is necessary.
Legal basis: Art. 29 para. 1 and para. 2 point 2 and Art. 24 para. 2 and 6 of the Road Traffic Act (Prawo o ruchu drogowym)